real-time market insights

Understanding Anchoring Bias: How It Influences Your Spending Decisions

Eleanor Wilson

21 Oct 2025 • 10 min read

Understanding Anchoring Bias: How It Influences Your Spending Decisions

Anchoring bias is a fascinating and powerful cognitive phenomenon that significantly influences our spending decisions. By understanding this bias, you can make more informed and rational financial choices. Let's delve into the intricacies of anchoring bias and explore how it shapes your spending habits.

What is Anchoring Bias?

Anchoring bias refers to the cognitive tendency to rely heavily on the first piece of information encountered (the "anchor") when making decisions. This initial piece of information sets a reference point that influences subsequent judgments and decisions, even if the anchor is arbitrary or irrelevant. The anchoring effect is a well-documented psychological heuristic that can lead to systematic errors in decision-making.

The concept of anchoring bias was first introduced by psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in their seminal work on cognitive biases. They demonstrated that individuals tend to fixate on an initial piece of information, or anchor, and then adjust their subsequent judgments around this anchor, often insufficiently. This phenomenon has been extensively studied and validated in various contexts, from everyday consumer decisions to high-stakes financial negotiations.

The Psychology Behind Anchoring Bias

The anchoring bias stems from dual-process theory, which posits that human cognition operates through two distinct systems. System 1 is fast, intuitive, and automatic, while System 2 is slow, deliberate, and analytical. When we encounter an anchor, System 1 rapidly assimilates it, creating a mental reference point. System 2, which is responsible for more deliberate analysis, often fails to sufficiently adjust away from this anchor, resulting in persistent cognitive distortions.

To illustrate this, consider a scenario where you are shopping for a new television. You walk into a store and see a high-end model priced at $2,000. Later, you come across a similar model priced at $1,500. Despite the fact that the $1,500 model may not necessarily be a good deal, the initial $2,000 price serves as an anchor, making the $1,500 price seem more reasonable and attractive. This is because System 1 quickly assimilates the $2,000 anchor, and System 2 fails to adequately adjust away from it, leading you to perceive the $1,500 price as a bargain.

How Anchoring Bias Affects Spending Decisions

Anchoring bias can have a profound impact on your spending habits. Here are some detailed examples of how it influences your financial decisions:

1. Retail Pricing Strategies

Retailers often use anchoring bias to their advantage by displaying an original price alongside a discounted price. For example, seeing a jacket's original price at $200 slashed to $120 creates a psychological anchor that makes the $120 price seem like a bargain, even if the item isn't worth that much. This strategy exploits the anchoring effect to make the discounted price appear more attractive, thereby increasing the likelihood of a purchase.

Consider a real-world example: a popular electronics retailer frequently uses this tactic during holiday sales. They display the original price of a smartphone at $800, then offer it at a discounted price of $600. The $800 anchor makes the $600 price seem like a steal, even if the smartphone's actual market value is closer to $550. This anchoring strategy can lead consumers to perceive the discounted price as a great deal, even if it is not.

Moreover, retailers often use anchoring in combination with other psychological pricing strategies, such as the use of the "99" ending. For instance, a product priced at $199 instead of $200 can create an additional anchor that makes the price seem lower. This combination of anchors can further influence consumer perception and increase the likelihood of a purchase.

2. Gift Shopping

When shopping for gifts, the first price you encounter can set an anchor that influences your subsequent spending. For instance, if you first see a $100 pair of earrings, a $75 necklace may then seem like a good deal, even though it exceeds your actual budget. This demonstrates how the first price encountered sets a mental reference point that skews subsequent judgments.

Imagine you are shopping for a birthday gift for a friend. You enter a jewelry store and see a pair of diamond earrings priced at $200. As you continue browsing, you come across a silver necklace priced at $150. Despite your initial budget of $100, the $200 anchor makes the $150 necklace seem like a reasonable purchase. This is because your mind has already been anchored to the higher price, making the $150 price seem more acceptable.

Additionally, the anchoring effect can be influenced by the context in which the prices are presented. For example, if you see a $200 pair of earrings in a high-end jewelry store, the anchor may have a stronger impact than if you see the same earrings in a discount store. The perceived value of the anchor can be influenced by the overall shopping environment, further skewing your spending decisions.

3. Real Estate Decisions

In the real estate market, buyers and sellers are both susceptible to anchoring bias. Buyers may anchor on the seller's initial asking price, leading them to overpay for a property if they negotiate a price below the anchor, even if the anchor was unrealistic. Sellers, on the other hand, can become anchored to outdated or aspirational prices, resulting in listed homes lingering unsold.

For example, a seller lists their home at $500,000, even though the market value is closer to $450,000. A potential buyer, seeing the $500,000 price, may anchor on this figure and negotiate a final price of $475,000. Despite the negotiation, the buyer has still overpaid for the property due to the initial anchor set by the seller's asking price. Similarly, the seller may refuse to lower the price below $475,000, even if the market indicates a lower value, because they are anchored to the initial asking price.

Furthermore, real estate agents often use anchoring strategies to influence both buyers and sellers. For instance, an agent may present a list of comparable properties with higher prices to anchor the seller's expectations, or they may show a buyer a few overpriced properties before presenting a more reasonably priced one to make it seem like a better deal.

4. Financial Forecasting

Anchoring bias is also prevalent in financial forecasting and budgeting. Studies have shown that anchoring can explain up to 34% of financial planning errors. This highlights the systematic impact of anchoring in budgeting and investment decisions, underscoring the need for awareness and intervention strategies.

Consider a financial advisor who provides an initial investment forecast of 10% annual returns. Based on this anchor, the client may set their financial goals and budget accordingly. However, if the actual market returns are closer to 7%, the client's financial plan may be significantly off track. This discrepancy arises because the initial 10% anchor influenced the client's subsequent financial decisions, leading to unrealistic expectations and potential financial strain.

Moreover, anchoring bias can affect financial decisions at both the individual and organizational levels. For instance, a company's management may anchor on a specific revenue growth target, leading to overly optimistic budgeting and strategic planning. This can result in financial shortfalls and strategic missteps if the actual market conditions do not align with the anchored expectations.

5. Negotiations and Bargaining

Anchoring bias plays a significant role in negotiations and bargaining situations. The first offer or proposal made in a negotiation often serves as an anchor, influencing the subsequent offers and counteroffers. This anchor can set the tone for the entire negotiation process, affecting the final outcome.

For example, in a salary negotiation, the initial offer made by the employer can serve as an anchor, influencing the employee's counteroffer. If the employer offers a salary of $70,000, the employee may anchor on this figure and negotiate a final salary of $75,000, even if the market rate for the position is higher. This anchoring effect can result in the employee accepting a lower salary than they might have otherwise.

Similarly, in business negotiations, the first offer made by one party can anchor the expectations of the other party, leading to a final agreement that may not be optimal for either side. Recognizing the anchoring effect in negotiations can help individuals and organizations make more informed and strategic decisions.

6. Investment Decisions

Anchoring bias can significantly impact investment decisions. Investors may anchor on a specific stock price, market index, or historical return, influencing their subsequent investment choices. This can lead to suboptimal investment strategies and potential financial losses.

For instance, an investor may anchor on a stock's 52-week high price, leading them to wait for the stock to reach that price before selling. However, if the stock's fundamentals have changed and the high price is no longer justified, the investor may miss out on better investment opportunities. Similarly, an investor may anchor on a specific market index, such as the S&P 500, and make investment decisions based on its performance, even if other indices or individual stocks offer better returns.

Additionally, anchoring bias can affect investment decisions related to asset allocation and diversification. Investors may anchor on a specific asset class or investment strategy, leading to an overconcentration of their portfolio in that area. This can increase portfolio risk and potentially result in significant losses if the anchored asset class underperforms.

Research Insights and Recent Findings

Recent research has shed light on the prevalence and impact of anchoring bias in various domains. A study of Indonesian financial professionals found a moderate to high prevalence of anchoring bias in financial forecasting and budgeting, directly correlating with increased errors in financial planning. This empirical evidence underscores the importance of recognizing and mitigating anchoring bias in financial decision-making.

Another study explored the anchoring effect in the context of consumer behavior, revealing that anchors can significantly influence purchasing decisions, even when the anchor is irrelevant to the product's value. For instance, participants in the study were more likely to purchase a product when it was presented with a higher anchor price, regardless of the product's actual quality or market value.

Furthermore, research has shown that anchoring bias can be influenced by individual differences, such as cognitive ability and personality traits. For example, individuals with higher cognitive ability may be less susceptible to anchoring bias, as they are better equipped to recognize and adjust for the anchoring effect. Similarly, individuals with a higher need for cognition may be more likely to engage in deliberate and analytical thinking, reducing the impact of anchoring bias.

Strategies to Counteract Anchoring Bias

While anchoring bias is a pervasive cognitive phenomenon, there are strategies to counteract its effects and make more informed financial decisions:

1. Awareness and Training

Recognizing the existence of anchoring bias is the first step toward mitigation. Training programs and structured decision-making frameworks can help individuals and organizations make more evidence-based choices. By being aware of the anchoring effect, you can actively seek to adjust your judgments away from the initial anchor.

For example, financial advisors can undergo training to recognize anchoring bias in their clients' decision-making processes. By being aware of this cognitive bias, advisors can guide their clients toward more realistic financial goals and expectations, reducing the impact of anchoring on their financial plans.

Additionally, organizations can implement training programs to educate employees about anchoring bias and other cognitive biases that may affect decision-making. This can help create a more informed and rational decision-making culture within the organization.

2. Broad Information Gathering

Actively seek multiple sources of information before making financial decisions. By gathering a broad range of data, you can avoid fixating on a single, potentially misleading anchor. This approach can help you make more informed and rational decisions.

Imagine you are considering a significant investment. Instead of relying on a single piece of information, such as a market analyst's prediction, gather data from various sources, including historical trends, economic indicators, and expert opinions. By considering a wide range of information, you can make a more well-rounded and informed investment decision, reducing the likelihood of being anchored to a single piece of data.

Moreover, using decision-support tools and technologies can help gather and analyze a broad range of information. For instance, financial planning software can provide multiple scenarios and projections, helping users make more informed decisions based on a comprehensive analysis of the available data.

3. Debiasing Techniques

Implementing technological tools and policy-level solutions can help reduce susceptibility to anchoring, particularly in complex financial environments. Debiasing techniques, such as using decision aids and structured decision-making processes, can mitigate the impact of anchoring bias.

For instance, financial institutions can implement decision-support systems that provide multiple data points and scenarios, helping users make more informed decisions. These systems can reduce the reliance on a single anchor by presenting a broader range of information, thereby mitigating the anchoring effect.

Additionally, organizations can implement structured decision-making processes that require multiple stakeholders to review and challenge the initial anchor. This collaborative approach can help identify and adjust for potential biases, leading to more informed and rational decisions.

4. Reframing the Decision Context

Reframing the decision context can help mitigate the anchoring effect by presenting information in a different way. For example, instead of presenting a single anchor price, retailers can provide a range of prices or a comparison with similar products. This can help consumers make more informed decisions by considering a broader range of information.

Similarly, in negotiations, reframing the decision context can help mitigate the anchoring effect. For instance, instead of focusing on a single offer, negotiators can consider a range of possible outcomes or use a structured negotiation process that encourages exploration of multiple options.

5. Encouraging Deliberate and Analytical Thinking

Encouraging deliberate and analytical thinking can help reduce the impact of anchoring bias. By engaging System 2, the slow and deliberate part of the brain, individuals can make more informed and rational decisions. This can be achieved through techniques such as mindfulness, meditation, and structured decision-making frameworks.

For example, individuals can practice mindfulness and meditation to improve their ability to recognize and adjust for cognitive biases, including anchoring bias. Additionally, using structured decision-making frameworks, such as the SWOT analysis or the decision matrix, can help individuals make more informed and rational decisions by considering a broader range of factors and options.

Anchoring bias is a pervasive force in financial decision-making, affecting everything from retail purchases to investment strategies and corporate planning. While difficult to eliminate entirely, understanding the mechanisms of anchoring and adopting targeted strategies can substantially improve the quality and rationality of spending and investment decisions. By being aware of the anchoring effect and implementing strategies to counteract it, you can make more informed and rational financial choices.